Tickwind
TodayOpportunitiesMarketsHotNewsAI Chat
What's new
EN
Log inSign up
Tickwind

Read every tick. See where the market's blowing.

Product

  • Markets
  • Theme Zones
  • All stocks
  • Compare
  • Hot stocks
  • Opportunities
  • News
  • Discussion
  • Watchlist
  • What's new

Account

  • Settings
  • Newsletter
  • For writers
  • MCP server
  • Contact
  • Log in
  • Sign up
MarketsTheme ZonesAll stocksCompareHot stocksOpportunitiesNewsDiscussionWatchlistWhat's newSettingsNewsletterFor writersMCP serverContactLog inSign up

© 2026 Tickwind. Not investment advice.

Made for the curious investor.

Home/Compare

GS vs SCHW

GS and SCHW side by side — valuation & fundamentals (public data).

Key statistics

GS vs SCHW key statistics
MetricGSThe Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.SCHWSCHWAB CHARLES CORP
Market cap$302.82B$186.05B
P/E (TTM)16.119.6
P/B2.473.71
P/S5.2x7.8x
Dividend yield1.74%1.25%
Revenue$66.20B(TTM)$26.02B(TTM)
Revenue growth (YoY)8.9%22.0%
Net income$20.97B(TTM)$1.25B(TTM)
Earnings growth (YoY)20.3%49.0%
EPS, diluted$64.76(TTM)$5.49(TTM)
EBIT margin152.1%38.9%
ROE14.0%0.0%
ROIC29.5%15.8%
1y total return+46.9%+13.5%

Figures from SEC filings · for reference only · not investment advice

Growth of $10,000: GS vs SCHW

$10.0K$82.6K$44.0K2016-04-062026-08-07
MetricGSSCHW
End value$82.6K$44.0K
Total return+726.4%+340.3%
CAGR+22.7%+15.4%
Volatility29.5%32.9%
Sharpe0.710.48
Sortino1.040.69
Max drawdown-48.8%-51.0%

Based on 2600 common trading days, 2016-04-06 → 2026-08-07 · risk-free 3.87% (current short-Treasury, held constant)

A head-to-head total-return backtest over real split- and dividend-adjusted prices: how a one-time $10,000 investment in each stock, held to today, would have grown over their common window — including reinvested dividends. A disclosed historical statistic — NOT a prediction, a guarantee, or investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results.

Related comparisons

GS vs MSGS vs JPMC vs GSMS vs SCHWJPM vs SCHWAAPL vs MSFT

Delayed data · Public sources · For reference only · Not investment advice (this page declares no winner)