Tickwind
TodayOpportunitiesMarketsHotNewsAI Chat
What's new
EN
Log inSign up
Tickwind

Read every tick. See where the market's blowing.

Product

  • Markets
  • Theme Zones
  • All stocks
  • Compare
  • Hot stocks
  • Opportunities
  • News
  • Discussion
  • Watchlist
  • What's new

Account

  • Settings
  • Newsletter
  • For writers
  • MCP server
  • Contact
  • Log in
  • Sign up
MarketsTheme ZonesAll stocksCompareHot stocksOpportunitiesNewsDiscussionWatchlistWhat's newSettingsNewsletterFor writersMCP serverContactLog inSign up

© 2026 Tickwind. Not investment advice.

Made for the curious investor.

Home/Compare

ASML vs KLAC

ASML and KLAC side by side — valuation & fundamentals (public data).

Key statistics

ASML vs KLAC key statistics
MetricASMLASML HOLDING NVKLACKLA CORP
Market cap$671.06B$258.79B
P/E (TTM)—54.1
P/B—40.76
P/S—19.1x
Dividend yield—0.41%
Revenue—$13.58B(TTM)
Revenue growth (YoY)—11.7%
Net income—$4.83B(TTM)
Earnings growth (YoY)—18.9%
EPS, diluted—$3.66(TTM)
EBIT margin—5.7%
ROE—76.1%
ROIC—7.5%
1y total return+144.3%+118.0%

Figures from SEC filings · for reference only · not investment advice

Growth of $10,000: ASML vs KLAC

$10.0K$188.4K$323.5K2016-04-062026-08-07
MetricASMLKLAC
End value$188.4K$323.5K
Total return+1784.0%+3135.0%
CAGR+32.9%+40.0%
Volatility38.8%42.6%
Sharpe0.830.91
Sortino1.201.34
Max drawdown-56.9%-43.6%

Based on 2600 common trading days, 2016-04-06 → 2026-08-07 · risk-free 3.87% (current short-Treasury, held constant)

A head-to-head total-return backtest over real split- and dividend-adjusted prices: how a one-time $10,000 investment in each stock, held to today, would have grown over their common window — including reinvested dividends. A disclosed historical statistic — NOT a prediction, a guarantee, or investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results.

Related comparisons

ASML vs TSMASML vs NVDAAMAT vs ASMLAMAT vs KLACKLAC vs LRCXASML vs LRCX

Delayed data · Public sources · For reference only · Not investment advice (this page declares no winner)