Tickwind
TodayOpportunitiesMarketsHotNewsAI Chat
What's new
EN
Log inSign up
Tickwind

Read every tick. See where the market's blowing.

Product

  • Markets
  • Theme Zones
  • All stocks
  • Compare
  • Hot stocks
  • Opportunities
  • News
  • Discussion
  • Watchlist
  • What's new

Account

  • Settings
  • Newsletter
  • For writers
  • MCP server
  • Contact
  • Log in
  • Sign up
MarketsTheme ZonesAll stocksCompareHot stocksOpportunitiesNewsDiscussionWatchlistWhat's newSettingsNewsletterFor writersMCP serverContactLog inSign up

© 2026 Tickwind. Not investment advice.

Made for the curious investor.

Home/Compare

AAPL vs META

AAPL and META side by side — valuation & fundamentals (public data).

Key statistics

AAPL vs META key statistics
MetricAAPLApple Inc.METAMeta Platforms, Inc.
Market cap$4.57T$1.50T
P/E (TTM)35.921.5
P/B42.526.15
P/S11.0x7.5x
Dividend yield0.34%0.36%
Revenue$466.82B(TTM)$214.96B(TTM)
Revenue growth (YoY)6.4%22.2%
Net income$128.93B(TTM)$70.59B(TTM)
Earnings growth (YoY)19.5%-3.1%
EPS, diluted$8.72(TTM)$27.50(TTM)
EBIT margin32.0%41.4%
ROE104.2%24.8%
ROIC74.7%21.0%
Piotroski F7/9—
1y total return+42.8%-22.0%

Figures from SEC filings · for reference only · not investment advice

Growth of $10,000: AAPL vs META

$10.0K$31.2K$52.5K2016-04-062026-08-07
MetricAAPLMETA
End value$31.2K$52.5K
Total return+212.0%+425.3%
CAGR+11.6%+17.4%
Volatility37.0%38.7%
Sharpe0.470.51
Sortino0.570.73
Max drawdown-78.9%-76.7%

Based on 2600 common trading days, 2016-04-06 → 2026-08-07 · risk-free 3.87% (current short-Treasury, held constant)

A head-to-head total-return backtest over real split- and dividend-adjusted prices: how a one-time $10,000 investment in each stock, held to today, would have grown over their common window — including reinvested dividends. A disclosed historical statistic — NOT a prediction, a guarantee, or investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results.

Related comparisons

AAPL vs MSFTGOOGL vs METAMETA vs NFLXAAPL vs GOOGLAAPL vs AMZNAMZN vs META

Delayed data · Public sources · For reference only · Not investment advice (this page declares no winner)